<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Littleton Examiner &#187; Community Response</title>
	<atom:link href="http://littletonexaminer.com/category/wal-mart/community-response/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://littletonexaminer.com</link>
	<description>A News Magazine for the People of Littleton, Colorado</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 18:31:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Thankl you City Council</title>
		<link>http://littletonexaminer.com/173/thankl-you-city-council</link>
		<comments>http://littletonexaminer.com/173/thankl-you-city-council#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 20:44:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Community Response]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://littletonexaminer.com/173/thankl-you-city-council</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear Council Members &#038; City Staff:
I want to thank members Mr. Clark, Ms. Kast and Mr. Mulvey for taking the time to listen and consider each citizens’ speech, for being open minded, reading, knowing and adhering to the City codes and ordinances and taking into account the welfare of the community, its citizens and environment.
Thank [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://littletonexaminer.com/173/thankl-you-city-council/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wal-Mart Not Impacting the Platte</title>
		<link>http://littletonexaminer.com/172/wal-mart-not-impacting-the-platte</link>
		<comments>http://littletonexaminer.com/172/wal-mart-not-impacting-the-platte#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 20:43:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Community Response]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://littletonexaminer.com/172/wal-mart-not-impacting-the-platte</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With all the hot air surrounding the rezoning of the Old Greenhouse Property, I am surprised that the snow stuck around as long as it did. When City Council makes the decision to rezone land that decision MUST be based upon facts, not likes and dislikes or even business practices. The facts supporting City Council’s [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://littletonexaminer.com/172/wal-mart-not-impacting-the-platte/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wal-Mart Concerns</title>
		<link>http://littletonexaminer.com/171/wal-mart-concerns</link>
		<comments>http://littletonexaminer.com/171/wal-mart-concerns#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 20:41:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Community Response]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://littletonexaminer.com/171/wal-mart-concerns</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Detention Pond:
The people of Littleton voted their Tabor refund to purchase a buffer to protect the park from the inevitable development of that site. Wal-Mart wants to put their detention pond on the property and call it a wetland. 
The land was bought to protect the park not to provide a developer with a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://littletonexaminer.com/171/wal-mart-concerns/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No more Wal-Mart bashing</title>
		<link>http://littletonexaminer.com/170/no-more-wal-mart-bashing</link>
		<comments>http://littletonexaminer.com/170/no-more-wal-mart-bashing#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 20:40:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Community Response]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://littletonexaminer.com/170/no-more-wal-mart-bashing</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Take me off the mailing list for The Littleton Examiner. You are a sad example of responsible, unbiased journalism when you publish four and half pages of Wal-Mart bashing, and three and a half lines of pro-Wal-Mart text (Jim DuBose’s comments) in your January 2007 edition.
Get off the Wal-Mart bashing bandwagon. Report the news fairly. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://littletonexaminer.com/170/no-more-wal-mart-bashing/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>We don&#8217;t need another one</title>
		<link>http://littletonexaminer.com/169/we-dont-need-another-one</link>
		<comments>http://littletonexaminer.com/169/we-dont-need-another-one#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 20:39:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Community Response]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://littletonexaminer.com/169/we-dont-need-another-one</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just don’t understand why we need another big Wal-Mart here in Littleton. I have three of them that are just five miles away in any direction. If this fly’s the downtown district of small businesses will really suffer and might have to close. Small town stores have the best climate and everyone that I [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://littletonexaminer.com/169/we-dont-need-another-one/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who is paying?</title>
		<link>http://littletonexaminer.com/168/who-is-paying</link>
		<comments>http://littletonexaminer.com/168/who-is-paying#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 20:38:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Community Response]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://littletonexaminer.com/168/who-is-paying</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Following the objections of the LAW group and retaining of legal counsel by them I have a question. Who is funding the cost of the lawyer? It will most certainly cost a large sum to pursue the “case” through the legal system as stated by Robert Hoban, Attorney at Law in the Littleton Independent. I [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://littletonexaminer.com/168/who-is-paying/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wrong location for Wal-Mart</title>
		<link>http://littletonexaminer.com/167/wrong-location-for-wal-mart</link>
		<comments>http://littletonexaminer.com/167/wrong-location-for-wal-mart#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 20:37:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Community Response]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://littletonexaminer.com/167/wrong-location-for-wal-mart</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wish to express dismay at the thought of another Wal-Mart in our area. To build a Wal-Mart in the proposed location on Santa Fe is insane when you realize what the destruction would be to the immediate area. Who wants to trade wildlife preserve for trucks?  A behemoth monstrosity for the river (scarce [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://littletonexaminer.com/167/wrong-location-for-wal-mart/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Yes, yes to Wal-Mart</title>
		<link>http://littletonexaminer.com/166/yes-yes-to-wal-mart</link>
		<comments>http://littletonexaminer.com/166/yes-yes-to-wal-mart#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 20:36:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Community Response]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://littletonexaminer.com/166/yes-yes-to-wal-mart</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am for Wal-Mart opening a new store. It will be more money for Littleton and more jobs for local people. We need a store in that area. Yes, Yes.
Anonymous
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://littletonexaminer.com/166/yes-yes-to-wal-mart/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The next slum</title>
		<link>http://littletonexaminer.com/165/the-next-slum</link>
		<comments>http://littletonexaminer.com/165/the-next-slum#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 20:20:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Community Response]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://littletonexaminer.com/165/the-next-slum</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Putting a Wal-Mart in our community will cheapen our surroundings. It will also cost our small businessmen the possible loss of their businesses. Littleton has always prided itself in the small community type center which will rapidly become a thing of the past as the great GIANT moves in. Don’t let Littleton become the next [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://littletonexaminer.com/165/the-next-slum/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Don&#8217;t Destroy Littleton Image</title>
		<link>http://littletonexaminer.com/164/dont-destroy-littleton-image</link>
		<comments>http://littletonexaminer.com/164/dont-destroy-littleton-image#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 20:19:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Community Response]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://littletonexaminer.com/164/dont-destroy-littleton-image</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree with you 100 percent. We must not have a Wal-Mart close to a central Littleton park. There is absolutely no reason why it cannot be located further south along Santa Fe. Littleton has been striving hard to become an upscale suburb, let us not destroy it now. Surely the extra money expected is [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://littletonexaminer.com/164/dont-destroy-littleton-image/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
