<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Littleton Examiner &#187; Editorial</title>
	<atom:link href="http://littletonexaminer.com/category/editorial/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://littletonexaminer.com</link>
	<description>A News Magazine for the People of Littleton, Colorado</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 18:31:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Rezoning Revisited:Will the Voters Be Heard?</title>
		<link>http://littletonexaminer.com/174/rezoning-revisitedwill-the-voters-be-heard</link>
		<comments>http://littletonexaminer.com/174/rezoning-revisitedwill-the-voters-be-heard#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 20:53:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Editorial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wal-Mart]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://littletonexaminer.com/174/rezoning-revisitedwill-the-voters-be-heard</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[City Council has voted to approve the Wal-Mart on Santa Fe. However, there is a group of citizens who are fighting to have this decision revisited by City Council and quite possibly put on the ballot for citizens themselves to decide. 
Littleton Against Wal-Mart has been getting petitions signed since the vote passed City Council. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://littletonexaminer.com/174/rezoning-revisitedwill-the-voters-be-heard/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Two Million Dollar Open Space &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://littletonexaminer.com/144/two-million-dollar-open-space</link>
		<comments>http://littletonexaminer.com/144/two-million-dollar-open-space#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 20:26:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Editorial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wal-Mart]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://littletonexaminer.com/144/two-million-dollar-open-space</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two Million Dollar Open Space &#8230;
with a Wal-Mart Next Door?
In the August 2003 issue of the Littleton Report (pictured below) the city announced a $2 million purchase of land designated for open space.

Here is what the article said:

“A strategic piece of open space was purchased in June by the City of Littleton that will serve [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://littletonexaminer.com/144/two-million-dollar-open-space/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Taxpayer Bill of Rights (TABOR)</title>
		<link>http://littletonexaminer.com/112/taxpayer-bill-of-rights-tabor</link>
		<comments>http://littletonexaminer.com/112/taxpayer-bill-of-rights-tabor#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 17:32:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Editorial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TABOR Tax Issue]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://littletonexaminer.com/112/taxpayer-bill-of-rights-tabor</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The city government collects taxes and spends the tax money.
The amount of money the city government can spend is limited by TABOR.
If the city government takes in more tax money than it is allowed to spend, TABOR requires that the excess taxes be returned to the taxpayers.
But, the city government can keep the excess taxes [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://littletonexaminer.com/112/taxpayer-bill-of-rights-tabor/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Examiner Recommendation on 2A</title>
		<link>http://littletonexaminer.com/100/examiner-recommendation-on-2a</link>
		<comments>http://littletonexaminer.com/100/examiner-recommendation-on-2a#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 14:58:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Editorial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TABOR Tax Issue]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://littletonexaminer.com/100/examiner-recommendation-on-2a</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Littleton Examiner’s Recommendation — Vote NO
Those who want to keep the excess money frequently say that they want the “flexibility” for planning. The taxpayers who want the excess money returned, deserve the flexibility to say NO to a bad plan.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://littletonexaminer.com/100/examiner-recommendation-on-2a/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Snapshot Update on Littleton City Council</title>
		<link>http://littletonexaminer.com/81/snapshot-update-on-littleton-city-council</link>
		<comments>http://littletonexaminer.com/81/snapshot-update-on-littleton-city-council#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2006 14:37:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Editorial]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://littletonexaminer.com/81/snapshot-update-on-littleton-city-council</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Police Facility
Apparently they approved spending $400,000 to fix-up the holding cells rather than to do what the city manager termed a permanent solution.
Sewer Tap Fees for New Customers
No change. The city will still undercharge the developers and make all of us who have already paid for the existing system buy a new system for the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://littletonexaminer.com/81/snapshot-update-on-littleton-city-council/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>They&#8217;re at it AGAIN</title>
		<link>http://littletonexaminer.com/19/theyre-at-it-again</link>
		<comments>http://littletonexaminer.com/19/theyre-at-it-again#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2006 13:09:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Complan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editorial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Urbanism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://littletonexaminer.com/http:/littletonexaminer.com/19/theyre-at-it-again</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[City Council &#038; Planning Commission Focus Exclusively on “New Urbanism”
By Jack Randall
The city council and planning commission have decided, in their collective majority opinions, that Littleton needs a change.  It needs to grow and generate more tax money for the council to spend.
To allow for that growth, Littleton’s current Comprehensive Plan must be changed.

As [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://littletonexaminer.com/19/theyre-at-it-again/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
